Should London's new concert hall be a shoe-box?

The possibility of Sir Simon Rattle getting a new concert hall built in London has sparked controversy. Unsurprisingly, there have been arguments about whether the Government should be spending £5.5M to develop a business plan or whether it is reasonable in a time of austerity to be contemplating spending something like £278m on a new auditorium.

More unexpected, there have been the arguments in the press about what shape the concert hall should be. (It seems to me a bit premature to be having such arguments.) Some have been saying it must be a shoe-box: rectangular and tall like the Musikverein in Vienna. Others have been arguing that a new design is needed, something bold like the Philharmonie de Paris with its futuristic curves and radical flying balconies and clouds. So what is the best shape for sound?

The perfect shoe-box? Grosser Musikvereinssaal

Musikverein photo
Musikverein, Photo Andreas Praefcke

The Grosser Musikvereinssaal is usually cited as one of the best concert halls in the World for classical music, and it is a shoe-box shape. But that doesn’t mean an exact replica should be built in London. The Musikverein has capacity of just under 1700. If a replica was built with the modern comfort requirements of half a square metre per seat, then only 1300 people would be able to fit in. This is too small an audience for the new London hall, which needs to have a capacity of around 2000.

How about copying Musikverein but making it a big bigger so enough people can fit in? But that doesn’t mean make it wider, because it is important to have plenty of early reflections arriving at the listener from the side. Numerous scientific studies dating back to the late 1960s have demonstrated the importance of early lateral reflections.

Sound coming straight from the stage gives the same sound at both ears. because the head is symmetrical and so the sound to both ears travel an identical path. When reflections come from the side, the sound at each ear is different. Sound to the furthest ear has to bend around the head. The difference in the sound at the two ear gives a sense of being enveloped by the sound and that improves the music.
Recent work by Jukka Pätynen and collaborators have demonstrated that the crescendos in the Musikverein are particularly impactful because of the strong, high-frequency lateral reflections.

If we can’t make the hall wider, we have to make it taller and longer. If you compare a modern shoebox concert hall like McDermott in Dallas, it is about one and a half times taller than the Musikverein. The problem with making it longer, is the unfortunate people who have to sit right at the back. Symphony Hall Birmingham rightly has a high reputation for its acoustics, but the hall is nearly ten-metres longer than St Davids Hall in Cardiff (a non-shoebox shape). It doesn’t require a scientific study to know that the quality of the experience drops off if you’re too far from the stage, for both visual and acoustic reasons. For this reason, a simple rule of thumb used in design is that the furthest audience member shouldn’t be more than 40 m from the stage [1].

Consequently, if London was to opt for a simple classic shoebox shaped hall with 2000 seats, in my opinion its hard to see how this design can work unless you make the decision that a certain number of these seats are going to less good because of the distance from the stage. Is there anything wrong with that? After all classic hippodrome theatres have ‘the gods’, the cheap seats, so this is something audiences are used to.

Lucerne, Photo: Eigenes Werk

If London does opt for a shoe-box hall, a modern design to copy would be the Culture and Congress Centre Concert Hall, Lucerne, Switzerland (but without the reverberation chambers). I haven’t heard the hall myself, but acoustic engineers I know talk about how good it sounds. Mind you, I think this is an unlikely option, because Lucerne is one a series of halls that were built to almost the same design. The second one in the series was Birmingham Symphony Hall. Where Birmingham leads London follows?!

More on other possible shapes next week.


[1] Barron, M., 2009. Auditorium acoustics and architectural design. Routledge.

Follow me

0 responses to “Should London's new concert hall be a shoe-box?”

  1. Hi, Trevor. How can I illustrate my scheme to be suggested for London hall? Could you send me info how to include the picture?

  2. Firstly, the £238 million proposal at Blackfriars is a non-starter: you can’t build a 21st century venue which is flexible, state of the art and fantastic design for the equivalent of peanuts. Check out the new Paris Concert Hall and it’s price tag.
    Secondly – that is like the current Barbican also in the wrong place!
    Just came back from an afternoon in that place and it is not just the Barbican Centre that is a failure – the whole monolithic housing estate – whatever the merits of the flats themselves – is a warning from the past how large scale mega redevelopment s do not work and quickly show their age. Where do you get a pint of milk? More than that, how do you get out? It’s gross. It should be demolished and consigned to the stone crusher as surely as the Height Estate around the Elephant and Castle.
    By deleting the Barbican Centre, buying back some of the leases and freeing up one or two of the existing blocks to redevelopment along with the Centre site, the Corporation of London has the possibility with today’s prices to not only rebuild the Barbican as a pleasant more diverse residential/commercial area, and and and…with money to spare for a brand new concert hall somewhere else.
    The Corporation of London owns dated sites for housing all over the City, and the reinvestment of windfall property profits in a site SOUTH (yes! you do read me right!) SOUTH of the river.
    I see a marvelous opportunity to decorate the Neo Liberal makeover of modern Britain with a new iconic public realm of mixed commercial/residential/teaching that contains also a brand new concert hall.
    I see the area between London Bridge and Waterloo within the area of the Southbank University as a prime location.
    As for a shoe box? They do work – but take the concert hall in Valencia (NOT THE OPERA HOUSE) which is not of shoe box design, but nonetheless fairly traditional yet has superb acoustics!
    But have we the Garlic balls to build London’s equivalent to the new home of the Orchestre de Paris under maestro Järvi?
    Rattle knows after 10 or more years on the Continent that we probably haven’t.
    Cheers David

  3. Hi there, the Barbican Centre’s theatre (City of London) is a shoe box shape, with a single rake of seats retreating to the rear of the imterior, where four balconies rise vertically. Limiting factors for an orchestra would be stage area. Could be suitable for opera, too.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: